ISO standards reflect a consensus of (mostly) a group of experts (investing time and money) - so there is no need to adapt criteria to the real world (since they struggle hard to find criteria in the given scope) :-) regards Andy Wir stellen den Hintergrund in den Vordergrund. We put the background in the foreground. ————————————————————————— Dr.-Ing. Andreas Kraushaar Abt. Vorstufentechnik Fogra Forschungsinstitut für Medientechnologien e.V. Einsteinring 1a 85609 Aschheim b. München Telefon: +49 89. 431 82 - 335 Telefax: +49 89. 431 82 - 100 E-mail: kraushaar@fogra.org Internet: www.fogra.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- Geschäftsführer: Dr. Eduard Neufeld | Sitz des Vereins: Aschheim b. München | Vereinsregister 4909
Am 17.06.2019 um 13:47 schrieb Malcolm Mackenzie via colorsync-users <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com>:
Hello Refik
Yes that is true but as with many of the ISO standards I believe we have to make some adjustment for the real world. Roger is using the FD-7, I used a GL SPECTIS 1.0 for the comparison. So good instruments for client side measuring. What is not acceptable and I see it a lot, is the supposed passing of lighting to ISO 3664:2009 using an i1Pro.
regards
Malcolm
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 11:54, Refik Telhan <rtelhan@icloud.com> wrote:
Dear Malcolm,
A full verification of a light source, as Mr. Claas Bickeböller has said, requires a device like Instrument Systems CAS 140CT-152 (with a range of 200 to 800 nm) which is beyond the reach of the typical printer.
The manufacturers have to take care of the
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. colorsync-users mailing list (colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/andreas.kraushaar%40...
This email sent to andreas.kraushaar@gmx.de