6 Jun
2013
6 Jun
'13
3:07 a.m.
At 7:51 PM -0700 6/5/13, Ben Goren wrote:
But the raw data, at least to some very useful approximation, with all the usual caveats about noise and the like, is close enough to linear that I haven't gotten burned (yet) by pretending that it is.
Well, I made that assumption as well. Maybe it depends on what accuracy level you're aiming for. If I remember my numbers, the tracking error for neutrals was in the range 0.5 - 1 dE. The camera noise level was much less than that. I lack standard deviation numbers for the spectral measurements though. (who does?) Lars