Hello folks, Hmm, I do remember the Spectralvision Pro iteration of ColorPort at least read linearization charts (hey, remember those?) in either direction. But maybe that was just when using the DTP20 Pulse? One thing ColorPort & Spectralvision Pro did that made for a MUCH better user experience on the iO table, was that to first set the 3 corner patches, you could "click" using the mouse, not just the button on the i1Pro. That seems to have gotten lost on i1Profiler. Using the button on my i1Pro (original) frequently results in the software detecting 2 clicks instead of one, moving past the corner patch I'm trying to mark to the next one. No way to correct this, just have to complete this step, then hit "start over". At first I thought it might just be a "hair trigger" button, but it seems to be a random result. Makes me long for those old days when I could position the i1Pro, then just click the mouse to set patch position. Anybody else see this on an i1 iO table? John JWL Images Emeryville, CA On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:31 AM, colorsync-users-request@lists.apple.com wrote:
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:29:16 -0400 From: Terence Wyse <wyseconsul@mac.com> To: "colorsync-users@lists.apple.com List" <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> Subject: Re: Thank you X-Rite! Message-ID: <02C864BE-6972-4891-A856-0FE8059770AD@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
ColorPort never had bi-directional charts for the i1Pro....still doesn't AFAIK.
Terry
On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:02 PM, John Lund <john@jwlimages.com> wrote:
Hmm, I do remember the Spectralvision Pro iteration of ColorPort at least read linearization charts (hey, remember those?) in either direction. But maybe that was just when using the DTP20 Pulse?
The Pulse could definitely read bi-directional....and measure rows out of order for that matter in ColorPort. The Pulse charts used a row identifier that took care of all this.....the i1Pro, not so much. Only problem with the Pulse was the reliance on a chart target identifier that relied on color codes......on a "raw" print from an inkjet printer, many times the 100% green patches were indistinguishable from black and would cause it to wig out. Terry
Terence Wyse wrote:
Only problem with the Pulse was the reliance on a chart target identifier that relied on color codes......on a "raw" print from an inkjet printer, many times the 100% green patches were indistinguishable from black and would cause it to wig out.
A problem with the Pulse is that it is extremely sensitive to the exact scale of the TID patches. Often this means that charts printed with Adobe Color Print Utility can't be used with the Pulse. Graeme Gill.
participants (3)
-
Graeme Gill
-
John Lund
-
Terence Wyse