Is the ICC still relevant?
In the recent RMI newsletter Robin asks and defines the issues within this question <http://rmimaging.com/information/Chromaxion_Issue_4.pdf>. The only thing Robin seems to have missed was that by going through the Lab connection space, some colors are changed. This disrupts my color output more than anything. The problem has been shown with great specificity by Bruce Lindbloom at <http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?MunsellCalcHelp.html#BluePurple>, from <http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?UPLab.html>. I was told that this problem was going to be corrected by a "forthcoming" revision initiative (10 years and counting), which also seems to have gone away. Is it time to move-on to some more responsive system. Working from an iPad doesn't allow color management. Won't we need an app to do that? Slap to the forehead... or is that what Apple is facilitating -- the creation of a color management app for their app-selling-machine, the iPad? I happen to know that the original proposal for colorsync was equation-based, rather than LUT-based. The LUT technology was added so that manufacturers could differentiate their various product levels using "secret sauce" back in the 1990s. In the meantime, product levels seems to have gone away. All the highend profile engines of the past have been bought and eliminated, except for ArgyllCMS (which has always been grassroots, but now with a mini-GUI). Or, have I gotten that wrong? ColorMunki vs i1Pro vs i1Pro2 all seem to use the same profile engine in a different wrapper. Or, have I gotten that wrong? Tim Vitale Oakland, CA
All quite different in terms of the hardware and their abilities to provide M series data. Maybe this will help: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/eye_one_pro_ii.shtml Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/
Thanks for the review of the i1Pro2. I saw your review of i1P software last year using the i1Prism engine <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/x_rite_i1profiler_rev iew.shtml>. You convinced me; I'm using PM 4.1.0, its time to upgrade. Do have a similar evaluation of the ColorMunki color calibration (printer profile?) software? So that I can compare its ability to make printer profiles. [Clearly the i1Pro2 is a superior tool.] I use the i1Pro, but the possibility of using the ColorMunki with an iPad (with 3rd-party measurement software) makes my mouth water. Tim Vitale Oakland, CA
On Apr 12, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Tim Vitale wrote:
Do have a similar evaluation of the ColorMunki color calibration (printer profile?) software? So that I can compare its ability to make printer profiles. [Clearly the i1Pro2 is a superior tool.]
Some of the ColorMunki is new in terms of the profile engine compared to ProfileMaker Pro. I1Profiler goes ever farther. There are vastly more options in terms of patches used, profile settings etc. ColorMunki works well be it is aimed at the entry market. There are not many options. There appers to be upgrades to i1Pro users if you can figure out from the X-rite web page all the permutations. http://www.xrite.com/product_overview.aspx?id=1951 Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/
Tim Vitale wrote:
The only thing Robin seems to have missed was that by going through the Lab connection space, some colors are changed. This disrupts my color output more than anything. The problem has been shown with great specificity by Bruce Lindbloom at <http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?MunsellCalcHelp.html#BluePurple>,
Encoding in an L*a*b* space does not imply that you have to gamut map in that space, so don't look to the ICC Lab encoding PCS as the culprit for such color problems. The gamut limits of ICC Lab PCS encoding can be an issue at times though. Graeme Gill.
participants (3)
-
Andrew Rodney
-
Graeme Gill
-
Tim Vitale