RE: PSO Coated v3 separations
Martin, Would using a different profiler help with the soft proofing issue, by any chance? Have you had the chance to try this on the BVDM images? At least, that would give you the beginning of a solution, regardless of your main policy... What about an Argyll profile? Best / Roger -----Original Message----- From: colorsync-users <colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=videotron.ca@lists.apple.com> On Behalf Of Claas Bickeböller Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 2:12 AM To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List <colorsync-users@lists.apple.com> Subject: Re: PSO Coated v3 separations Martin, if I remember the discussion about FOGRA52 the conclusion was: There are gamut mapping algorithms out there which give decent results using the new characterization data. It’s just that they are not inside the profilers you have currently access to. Correct? So why don’t you simply buy a decent profiler, create a profile with a mapping that you prefer and give these profiles to your clients? My 2 cents Claas
On 24 Aug 2018, at 13:44, graxx@videotron.ca wrote:
Would using a different profiler help with the soft proofing issue, by any chance? Have you had the chance to try this on the BVDM images? At least, that would give you the beginning of a solution, regardless of your main policy...
What about an Argyll profile?
Roger I’ve tried a lot of workarounds. We do use Argyll to create high GCR separations as there is no useful method of producing a one-shot ICC profile to accomplish this in 51 or 52.. We have to convert to 51 and 52 using the standard profiles (or GMG ColorServer) and then use ArgyllCMS to reseparate the image with K & CMY curves that we can control. If you try and achieve this in either i1Profiler or Argyll in one hit you end up with too little or even *no* yellow in the final separations. Regards -- Martin Orpen Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
participants (2)
-
graxx＠videotron.ca
-
Martin Orpen