review of camera profiling tool
Hi guys - in the latest post of my seldom updated blog I've reviewed a script by Iliah Borg which takes much of the pain out of creating camera profiles with Argyll. http://photofeedback.blogspot.fr/2013/07/iliah-borgs-makeinputicc-camera.htm... What might be useful discussing on-list is why the ICC model seems to have failed so badly in the raw converter arena - which seems to have fallen to Adobe. Edmund
Hello Edmund: Thank you for the comments and the links. One question. It this piece of software similar and provide the references you mention what you can get here?: http://www.jpereira.net/descargar-rough-profiler-software-pefil-color-icc-fr... Jose Bueno 2013/7/7 edmund ronald <edmundronald@gmail.com>
Hi guys -
in the latest post of my seldom updated blog I've reviewed a script by Iliah Borg which takes much of the pain out of creating camera profiles with Argyll.
http://photofeedback.blogspot.fr/2013/07/iliah-borgs-makeinputicc-camera.htm...
What might be useful discussing on-list is why the ICC model seems to have failed so badly in the raw converter arena - which seems to have fallen to Adobe.
Edmund _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/jbueno61%40gmail.com
This email sent to jbueno61@gmail.com
Yes. Me parece que si. Edmund On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:37 AM, José Ángel Bueno García <jbueno61@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Edmund:
Thank you for the comments and the links.
One question. It this piece of software similar and provide the references you mention what you can get here?:
http://www.jpereira.net/descargar-rough-profiler-software-pefil-color-icc-fr...
Jose Bueno
2013/7/7 edmund ronald <edmundronald@gmail.com>
Hi guys -
in the latest post of my seldom updated blog I've reviewed a script by Iliah Borg which takes much of the pain out of creating camera profiles with Argyll.
http://photofeedback.blogspot.fr/2013/07/iliah-borgs-makeinputicc-camera.htm...
What might be useful discussing on-list is why the ICC model seems to have failed so badly in the raw converter arena - which seems to have fallen to Adobe.
Edmund _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/jbueno61%40gmail.com
This email sent to jbueno61@gmail.com
One question. It this piece of software similar and provide the references you mention what you can get here?:
http://www.jpereira.net/descargar-rough-profiler-software-pefil-color-icc-fr...
Yes and no. MakeInputICC does not include scanin, instead it relies on RawDigger CGATS output. The reasons are: - RawDigger allows to profile right from raw data and knows very well how to extract and process that data - it preconditions the data with gamma, white balance, end exposure "compensation" if asked to - it allows to use flat field compensation from a separate shot - it allows to sample irregular targets and provide visual feedback while sampling - it is a better tool (though not automatic atm) when one wants to create a set of data from a multi-page target or from shots of the same target with different exposures. MakeInputICC keeps Argyll utilities in a separate folder, easy to access by the user; if the user prefers some other version of Argyll it is an easy operation to replace the bins. MakeInputICC prefers spectral reference files (while RoughProfiler seems to have problems processing spectral data), for the reason of scaling spectrum data according to exposure. MakeInputICC generates white point, black point, deltaE2000, and neutrality reports. Finally, the reason I made it is that I have control over MakeInputICC to develop it to be more useful for camera profiling ;) -- Best regards, Iliah Borg
Thanks Edmund and Iliah. I'm going to work with this tool at home today. 2013/7/8 Iliah Borg <iliah.i.borg@gmail.com>
One question. It this piece of software similar and provide the references you mention what you can get here?:
http://www.jpereira.net/descargar-rough-profiler-software-pefil-color-icc-fr...
Yes and no.
MakeInputICC does not include scanin, instead it relies on RawDigger CGATS output. The reasons are: - RawDigger allows to profile right from raw data and knows very well how to extract and process that data - it preconditions the data with gamma, white balance, end exposure "compensation" if asked to - it allows to use flat field compensation from a separate shot - it allows to sample irregular targets and provide visual feedback while sampling - it is a better tool (though not automatic atm) when one wants to create a set of data from a multi-page target or from shots of the same target with different exposures.
MakeInputICC keeps Argyll utilities in a separate folder, easy to access by the user; if the user prefers some other version of Argyll it is an easy operation to replace the bins.
MakeInputICC prefers spectral reference files (while RoughProfiler seems to have problems processing spectral data), for the reason of scaling spectrum data according to exposure.
MakeInputICC generates white point, black point, deltaE2000, and neutrality reports.
Finally, the reason I made it is that I have control over MakeInputICC to develop it to be more useful for camera profiling ;)
-- Best regards, Iliah Borg
I'm going to work with this tool at home today.
Some introduction on how to use MakeInputICC is here: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51765762 -- Best regards, Iliah Borg
participants (3)
-
edmund ronald
-
Iliah Borg
-
José Ángel Bueno García