Still trying to wrap my head around the impact of the new M0 vs M1 measurement modes. So I undertook to compare readings using instruments I have access to, Konica Minolta FD-9 and FD-7, Techkon Spectrodens II (M0), i1Pro2 and 528 (M0). Summary of my findings in PDF available here: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AkD78CVR1NBqkLUs_vxByslr_IwLkQ The results are quite encouraging. I wish I could have included eXact and the latest Spectrodens IV or Barbieri or iSis2... One study (Sharma) I came across suggested more variation between different models in M0 mode but I could not replicate this on the basis of my measurements. This study also concluded that there was less variation between different models in M1 mode, which matches my findings. Given the slew of "Fogra51/52" related posts, lately, I intend to pursue with creating M1-based ICC profiles on OB substrates to test Refik and Martin rants about the "weird" (cold?) color separations behaviors they observed in their respective practices... This should prove interesting 😊 to say the least. Thank you all for your patience. / Roger Breton www.graxx.ca