July 2007 - Darwin-dev - lists.apple.com

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Jordan K. Hubbard 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: Problem loading GCC 4.0 libraries into Java app
by Zoltan Foley-Fisher 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Garth Cummings 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Mike Frysinger 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m7puWO/Y2OYYJ/3tS24qVKP70VfbApWbY0ah0IibEu9t1O0tyMrdgDnb50ZVvRDIZwX8a0DANeslsvJTCTuoWeQlwHSyYzfFTSo8BZlpelbzqArNKD2s7MprTo0IhNxrxXm8oiNRQVHbwCmOvp69xCvAalMwUBzx5An17OtTXTo= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qCxH2XflgDykQe+3CD6G8qjbyHDKx0pY96gklF/bi2fdPIkpr0j4xOXmFhGT4un5VTnRl9JIFNNl8mBr7ty/EEHmGWQUvIpXLeyEyz3tOMCbhwhNHuoh50uAIRRsT+XqW6nUSYs46sySBnJErMsqnqmbNFp5KdKZN/jwyKb1L5s= On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:19 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 7/12/07, Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh(a)apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i dont even know what a "DTS representative" ... my guess is you're > > > punting me to the marketing team or something ? how is it a forward > > > looking statement if 10.5 has already been certified ? > > > > I think Terry's just being cautious. We've already stated publicly > > that Leopard is UNIX03 compliant and will, of course, ship that way so > > you can infer from this that it passed the test in question well > > enough to pass muster with The Open Group. > > i guess it isnt possible to ask for a fix for 10.4.x ... especially > since i dont have any sort of customer $$$ backing the request, just > some lamer who wants to compile the kernel sanely. It is entirely within the realm of possibility that Apple ran the UNIX03 conformance tests on a UFS filesystem. So, on Tiger, you'd get the same results if you also used one. Terry, I think, originally suggested doing this on a UFS disk image. you're right, he did suggest that. unfortunately, that answer isnt really acceptable to the people i'm supporting who are trying to cross-compile the Linux kernel on OS X. If it is the case that Apple did run the complete test suite on UFS, you could probably make the case to the opengroup that the tests ought to be run on the system's default filesystem, i'll make queries along these lines, thanks. however, since 10.5 has already been certified as UNIX, this would not force any change until a later release. i'm pretty sure the opengroup guys reserve the right to revoke certification at any point. their document even makes statements like "passing the testsuite is an indicator of conformance, not a guarantee". again though, my intentions here are just to have a usable system for people, not to undermine Apple or anything like that. -mike _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… On 7/12/07, Peter O'Gorman <peter(a)pogma.com> wrote: This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Peter O'Gorman 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:19 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 7/12/07, Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh(a)apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i dont even know what a "DTS representative" ... my guess is you're > > > punting me to the marketing team or something ? how is it a forward > > > looking statement if 10.5 has already been certified ? > > > > I think Terry's just being cautious. We've already stated publicly > > that Leopard is UNIX03 compliant and will, of course, ship that way so > > you can infer from this that it passed the test in question well > > enough to pass muster with The Open Group. > > i guess it isnt possible to ask for a fix for 10.4.x ... especially > since i dont have any sort of customer $$$ backing the request, just > some lamer who wants to compile the kernel sanely. It is entirely within the realm of possibility that Apple ran the UNIX03 conformance tests on a UFS filesystem. So, on Tiger, you'd get the same results if you also used one. Terry, I think, originally suggested doing this on a UFS disk image. If it is the case that Apple did run the complete test suite on UFS, you could probably make the case to the opengroup that the tests ought to be run on the system's default filesystem, however, since 10.5 has already been certified as UNIX, this would not force any change until a later release. Peter _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Mike Frysinger 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cakm8ah9hweUV/QSi8rjPxNHeqBRZbtBcfy2mGn1VcHjnoFOUoOALlwp6hCaroIlJUxnTC5Qz3roXcDgCMH4ekd+KoEn+bXHUNTpwcTYWQPyE/Ni1gLoK9z8WiLSdPR9sMzZdftd1KpLzS3HmkhULXcQCnlLrmGiFwCtOwN3j6A= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fh8dwogRRvbcNTyuoezqt+8+V8z+o/WBzisOMRg/KUQ2Ju+Bn29mCAJusEug6LqzDoLH0Yu0chZtngOB+esrOg1wjI/XQdqw72z68ToTtGa4F40fEf9RTQA6xPri/d0Q2xVYIHrk1pDihUr/yS3y/hqQvy6EwJ1RXGIEL4tbvE0= On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i dont even know what a "DTS representative" ... my guess is you're > punting me to the marketing team or something ? how is it a forward > looking statement if 10.5 has already been certified ? I think Terry's just being cautious. We've already stated publicly that Leopard is UNIX03 compliant and will, of course, ship that way so you can infer from this that it passed the test in question well enough to pass muster with The Open Group. i guess it isnt possible to ask for a fix for 10.4.x ... especially since i dont have any sort of customer $$$ backing the request, just some lamer who wants to compile the kernel sanely. -mike _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… On 7/12/07, Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh(a)apple.com> wrote: This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Jordan K. Hubbard 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: i dont even know what a "DTS representative" ... my guess is you're punting me to the marketing team or something ? how is it a forward looking statement if 10.5 has already been certified ? - Jordan _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… I think Terry's just being cautious. We've already stated publicly that Leopard is UNIX03 compliant and will, of course, ship that way so you can infer from this that it passed the test in question well enough to pass muster with The Open Group. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Mike Frysinger 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=St8kA+a/ILa41XwDcksuyAFn7cNkbD+UJ3CvOGtTxFV1zuhjWLzGt9KfnAm0npQZi7cJ3BNirI3xyNnm6hsIGIM0PoxPeH04ABYaV/dFUHd4JFIi7MoNWtjj+pgAomX48Bs7CTORr2y2fK1b0phqI5wWVPRF9qO373wjbrBoPVM= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bbqYPPeb12k8MPXt1dE1R9MqjXuEbhV7h/hhDsr0f82pN9yFlH2KogNF9ICOQviUZP+uX+jbVayOVnhWvS1ej3ht+qAKAyW5gJMARjmLGeBkMQ779BnpqqXm47/S1MRMrHsgtj5gKLsSsOFxxAqPiqDrme7PslCK1Q1O+gGSeeY= On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 7/10/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/9/07, Terry Lambert <tlambert(a)apple.com> wrote: >> > Maybe you could get them to add it as a test case for the test >> suite, >> > if they (specifically, The Austin Group, actually) agreed with your >> > interpretation of the standard. >> >> so the answer to my query on the Austin Group mailing list is that >> the >> way ive interpreted the standard is the correct interpretation ... >> POSIX conforming systems must: >> - update st_mtime when opened with O_TRUNC regardless of the size of >> the file before hand >> - make sure st_ctime/st_mtime are properly available at the next >> relevant point in time (like when calling stat() or fstat()) >> >> i'll look into getting a test added to the POSIX testsuite > > and i've been informed that a test already exists that should match > the behavior i'm describing: POSIX.os/files/open 19 > > i'm testing 10.4.x and not 10.5 (which is the version that was > certified), so perhaps 10.5 has already been fixed ? Sorry, can't make forward looking statements; you'd need to talk to your DTS representative. i dont even know what a "DTS representative" ... my guess is you're punting me to the marketing team or something ? how is it a forward looking statement if 10.5 has already been certified ? -mike _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… On 7/11/07, Terry Lambert <tlambert(a)apple.com> wrote: This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: open() fails to update st_mtime when used with O_TRUNC and 0 byte files
by Terry Lambert 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com and i've been informed that a test already exists that should match the behavior i'm describing: POSIX.os/files/open 19 i'm testing 10.4.x and not 10.5 (which is the version that was certified), so perhaps 10.5 has already been fixed ? -- Terry _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On 7/10/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 7/9/07, Terry Lambert <tlambert(a)apple.com> wrote: > Maybe you could get them to add it as a test case for the test suite, > if they (specifically, The Austin Group, actually) agreed with your > interpretation of the standard. so the answer to my query on the Austin Group mailing list is that the way ive interpreted the standard is the correct interpretation ... POSIX conforming systems must: - update st_mtime when opened with O_TRUNC regardless of the size of the file before hand - make sure st_ctime/st_mtime are properly available at the next relevant point in time (like when calling stat() or fstat()) i'll look into getting a test added to the POSIX testsuite Sorry, can't make forward looking statements; you'd need to talk to your DTS representative. This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0

Re: undefined symbols _JNI_CreateJavaVM
by Heidi Zhou 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=5g1kDNaZEDAbrPtvlMU0Vzm4pcXTRjDYrewiFiejnj2RFfSV8w22AY6cI5zPpXPdVd8H9kUDlTB6W7isOZ79mknlCGDsgZQx6CdxAbMu7JUeaKwxqEYJYG1wX51AtpbJrf+hAsgIZhKXfp42pgnHjENwj8mgOaW38B+4iayFVu8=; Great! It works. Thank everyone for helping. Heidi --- Greg Parker <gparker(a)apple.com> wrote: > > There is function "JNI_CreateJavaVM" defined in > the Java's > > libserver.dylib (where the libjvm.dylib link to on > my system). > > > > Which should I use instead to launch JVM through > my code? > > Short answer: link to JavaVM.framework (`-framework > JavaVM`) and call > JNI_CreateJavaVM(). > > See these references for important details: > > Invoking the Java Virtual Machine from Native Code > http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2005/tn2147.html#TNTAG31 > > simpleJavaLauncher sample code > http://developer.apple.com/samplecode/simpleJavaLauncher/index.html > > java-dev mailing list > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev > > > -- > Greg Parker gparker(a)apple.com Runtime > Wrangler > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev(a)lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.app… This email sent to site_archiver(a)lists.apple.com

1 0