site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) In message <1B305C63-31A8-4AF8-87A8-DA62443D5399@doit.wisc.edu>, Dave Schroeder writes: And have these changes been submitted back to the rsync maintainers? Or are they really not interested in this? (And I'm really genuinely curious when I ask this...) I have a hard time imagining anyone but Apple ever caring about resource forks. The inconsistency with the fundamental UNIX file model is simply too great. Not to mention, I believe the implementation uses SPI and as a result isn't even buildable out of the box (needs private Darwin headers, builds with darwinbuild fine though). There is only one private header file needed: copyfile.h <http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.5.ppc/Libc-391.2.5/darwin/copyfile.h> -- Martin _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... Finlay Dobbie wrote: On 3/4/06, Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net> wrote: With this dropped in, you just say "make" in the source directory and it builds. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com