site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Stephane Sudre writes:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/uts/common/inet/tcp/ tcp.c
CVSWeb is good but IMHO this kind of feature is better when you want to browse source code.
It strikes me as a symbol of the difference in spirit of the two projects. I don't know if you are on any of the Open Solaris mailing lists, but, unlike Darwin, Open Solaris is really open to community feedback. Apple could really learn a lot from how Sun deal with Open Solaris.. Sun engineers are subscribed Open Solaris mailing lists and are actually allowed to discuss (*gasp*) future development directions openly, and they actively solicit feedback from the community. They make snapshots of the future version of Solaris available for free download. Contrast this with Apple, who charges $500 for the ADC membership required to be able to download future versions of Darwin, and will not let you talk about them in a public forum. There are interesting discussions going on now on their networking discuss list which are a good example of the openness I'm talking about. See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=3 Drew _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com