site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=pamr3rOoVAkdkNQycrrBF++9TBS60fJTWnLrVcvjaCo=; b=fh8fzTJwe+2MGe6JzjM+O7aLln0vlHt4+wnHo8aaTm0nGPDteGANYRPDwRUV/5pobZ qZwZEhbA9Lb4QG+n8HUd2YxP6p1HJvPCdMowbnGAW4dXvkebrF2fqQHUexR82TE964E4 hcajMcaslmuJ8xXzaz3pw++xAJWeP6bVKO6bY= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=tduoe8mYSgpd1DfLSJfCf0JWTtI7YB2Jg6H/sR/TQcOEx76Z9+dR2MTL+K4w/vOOPy 429bDnquu1u9/hJ+qVNWtlWDB96xyYkOl6xiMGe4Ucar+1UMXgaUexZMn6Kh2BCvYzJ3 Ur5Jl4VhAKfw3ggjqzEWuHO/+XRw4c1LHhD+Y= Damien, On Jan 27, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Damien Sorresso wrote:
By doing this, you're basically guaranteeing that Firefox can never participate in the code signing model.
Firefox download partial updates right now, including binary code. It kicks off the updater once the download is done and updates itself. This prevents Firefox from participating in the code signing model so compression would not be much different. What are the huge benefits to participating in code signing?
Maybe you don't care right now, but then again, maybe one day you'll want to use the Keychain APIs.
Is code signing a must to use the Keychain APIs? Can you please clarify? Thanks, Joel --- http://wagerlabs.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com