site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On Jun 8, 2006, at 6:32 PM, proclus@gnu-darwin.org wrote: Yes, "Darwin", technically, still is open source, since Darwin is a strategy that represented the act of open sourcing many key components of the OS. That is still true. Darwin is an OS, and in order to be FOSS all the components of the OS must be buildable from freely available source code. That is not the case for the current version, although it is true of some earlier versions. One might say that Darwin is no longer open source, but the older versions still are. Darwin is more than "an OS". - Dave _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com On 8 Jun, Dave Schroeder wrote: But Darwin isn't open source anymore. You can't compile your own version of Darwin for Intel anymore. It's also Apple's larger open source strategy, which represents open source components and projects on Mac OS X. The major utility from "Darwin" for almost all users who benefit from Darwin comes from the latter, not from being able to build a bootable free OS. (This statement is not opinion; it is fact.) smime.p7s