site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On vendredi, novembre 2, 2007, at 04:29 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote: On Nov 2, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Stéphane Sudre wrote: On jeudi, novembre 1, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Dean Reece wrote: Ok, long version of the story. I'm looking at an application that uses 3 kernel extensions: - 2 KPI Kext (one has a dependency on the IOKit kext below) - 1 IOKit/KPI kext. I'm curious why there's a complaint in one case and none in the other. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... On Nov 1, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Stéphane Sudre wrote: What's a personality supposed to be for a StartupItem or Kernel Extension? OK, but then why does Leopard tells me a kext that is not related to IOKit has no personalities? If the future please provide more information in your posts about the problem or question you have. Your first post was a vague question that left many of guessing at what you wanted to know and now you give us little more to work with on what type kext you are seeing this issue with and what that kext has in its plist, etc. So more information please ... it will get you a better answer and likely more quickly. The KPI kexts are loaded through a launchd script with the kexload -v argument. The Info.plist files of both kexts are globally the same (names differ). On Leopard, when I look at system.log, one of KPI is said to not have any personality while there's no complaint for the other.
From the information I gather, I think it would be better if I remove the IOKit kext and merge it into the kext that depends on it. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com