site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :mime-version:date:references:x-mailer; bh=n++HER+RBb9mqnWOyEOcCTqnYcpTf6mBjtPHxkeiFsU=; b=kv+oNeUC+7EYdP+xzYFdB8k62UwM6zz/S9HW5fHHdJ5XQWzuVgCsrpfmmSdYyUMJtl UZuGwsHG6xwr8EmagPXmG2jrhHIdcUslfhnjh4gMEu6+bGwCqljhWJiMSZJyyoW6IC1k qyqH6MOYwbVslchmxR4Mjb4LSzGkWwsAMhapg= Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:mime-version:date:references :x-mailer; b=U7xRZFKmqWCxS/t4cRsFlFw12Be31Sc7ny1/0+BYw/WendYTRikarwYLciqW6THuCq GXnZTlQJ43LmUsdUw7mPq6aMCZ4ATLjmQvtz+G4CvBPapFI5kupWHZymYaUu7vTxzPwl bZndPOvWFXY7F5/bqDHj5K6HF9N9G+lT8k1KI= On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Karan, Cem (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:59:18 +0100 Jonas Maebe wrote: On 25 Mar 2009, at 19:41, Karan, Cem (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote: Well, the installed version of the dot tool has 4 architectures: ppc i386 64-bit ppc64 64-bit x86_64 The installed expat library comes back as i386. So dyld should be fine, right? If a command line app has both 32 and 64 bit versions available and is executed on a 64 bit machine, then the 64 bit version will be executed. Use arch -i386 dot ... to force the OS to start the 32 bit version. I also wonder why your expat library is missing three quarters of the archs that Apple ships. Eli _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... The expat thing is almost certainly not Apple's fault; I got desperate when dot didn't work so I recompiled and installed expat myself. If the build system doesn't properly build all the architectures, then (of course) my newly installed libraries won't have all architectures. I have not checked to see if libexpat does have proper makefiles, but I can do that later on (more pressing issues now) If someone has an OS X 10.5.6 distribution that doesn't have their own libexpat installed over Apple's and is able to double check this, can you please post to the list if Apple IS shipping a library that only has one architecture? The installed version of libexpat.1.5.0.dylib on my Intel 10.5.6 machine has all 4 architectures (32/64 bit PPC & 32/64 bit 386) This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com