site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com davez On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Dave Zarzycki wrote: Why do you ask? davez On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Eric Grant wrote: The mach_msg man page states: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.x86/xnu-792.13.8/osfmk/m an/mach_msg.html. Is this statement true for Darwin's implementation of mach? Thanks, Eric Grant _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/zarzycki%40apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... More to the point, how did you find yourself in such a scenario where the answer to that question matters? Have you considered using the tool called 'mig' to automate IPC stub generation and demux? If MACH_RCV_TIMEOUT is used without MACH_RCV_INTERRUPT, then the timeout duration might not be accurate. When the call is interrupted and automatically retried, the original timeout is used. If interrupts occur frequently enough, the timeout interval might never expire. MACH_SEND_TIMEOUT without MACH_SEND_INTERRUPT suffers from the same problem. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/zarzycki %40apple.com This email sent to zarzycki@apple.com This email sent to zarzycki@apple.com This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com