site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Cheers, -- M. Uli Kusterer http://www.zathras.de _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... Am 29.04.2007 um 21:15 schrieb Eric Albert: Actually, it's easier to have it pushed this way. Here's one reason: x is at offset 0 in the struct and y is at offset 4. When code references this struct, it'll reference it from the base address. If that's, say, %eax, x ends up as 0(%eax) and y is 4(%eax). Right! Sorry for that stupid question. That, of course, makes perfect sense. That way you can use the same offset tables for everything and save yourself a little maths. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com