site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com - Alex On Jun 25, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Clark Cox wrote: Hi all, They seem to be vastly different. So my questions are: - which one is supposed to be used? You use whichever corresponds to the compiler that you're using The compiler chooses (i.e. you shouldn't have to worry about it) -- Clark S. Cox III clarkcox3@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... Thanks! I figured that could be the case, but couldn't find any trace of presence of gcc/g++ 3.3 on the system. BTW, any idea why they're not installed as part of the toolkit, while the headers are? On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Agranovsky <alex@voxeo.com> wrote: OSX 10.5 SDK seems to include two STL implementations -- one in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.3/c++/, another one in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/usr/include/c++/4.0.0/. - what controls which one is picked? This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com