site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com I haven't used CodeWarrior in years so I can't really comment on it. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: This code looks intuitively correct, so it *should* be OK, in general sense. A closely related issue in the C++ standard is described here: <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg- active.html#463> (may even be exactly the same, I'm not sure). When corrections to the standard introduce such severe regressions, I don't know who is to blame. This looks like the exact same issue. I guess I'm not the first to encounter it. =) CodeWarrior compiles this just fine (why am I not surprised?), but still doesn't compile other intuitively correct code (grrrr...): - Steve smime.p7s