site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0 The mach_msg man page states: If MACH_RCV_TIMEOUT is used without MACH_RCV_INTERRUPT, then the timeout duration might not be accurate. When the call is interrupted and automatically retried, the original timeout is used. If interrupts occur frequently enough, the timeout interval might never expire. MACH_SEND_TIMEOUT without MACH_SEND_INTERRUPT suffers from the same problem. http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.x86/xnu-792.13.8/osfmk/m an/mach_msg.html. Is this statement true for Darwin's implementation of mach? Thanks, Eric Grant _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com