site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) I have a hard time imagining anyone but Apple ever caring about resource forks. The inconsistency with the fundamental UNIX file model is simply too great. Not everyone agrees... http://lwn.net/2000/0817/a/lt-fork.php3 Sadly, in more than 5 years, not much has happened with his request... Allow me to present someone else's work: http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html#files_dirs Doesn't that do what the above post describes? -- Graham Lee UNIX Systems Manager, Oxford Physics Practical Course http://users.ox.ac.uk/~wadh1342 _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... On 7/3/06 22:15, Peter Bierman wrote: At 7:18 AM -0600 3/4/06, Peter Seebach wrote: In message <1B305C63-31A8-4AF8-87A8-DA62443D5399@doit.wisc.edu>, Dave Schroeder writes: And have these changes been submitted back to the rsync maintainers? Or are they really not interested in this? (And I'm really genuinely curious when I ask this...) This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com