site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Is this the right place for this question? I was just wondering if: 1. 10.4.10 had a bug 2. 10.5 has a bug 3. the definition of how the -n option is supposed to work has changed Under 10.4.10, when executing cp -n, cp would return an exit status of 0 if the file you told it to copy existed or not. Under 10.5, cp will return an exit status of 1 if the file already exists and one uses the -n option. It seems strange that cp would return an exit status of 1 now if the file already exists. After all, the command will do exactly what it is supposed to do and not copy the file. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com