site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On Aug 17, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Dave Schroeder wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Dave Schroeder wrote: Thanks, - Kevin _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... What happened to the Xcode 2.3 source on http:// www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/ ? Since 2.2, 2.1, 1.5, 1.2, 1.1, and previous developer tool releases are still there, I didn't assume it was because the (expected) source release for Xcode 2.4 was imminent... - Dave So is this the kind of new, expanded support for open source and better communication channels we can expect, post-WWDC? - Dave Sorry, forgot to put the ;-) I intended on the end of that, but it is a serious question: again, we have a released open source item (in this case, all of Xcode 2.3) just disappearing, and a question to really the only channel we have about it goes unanswered. The link to the Xcode 2.3 sources was accidentally overwritten when making another update to the index page. The sources didn't really disappear, there just wasn't a top-level link to them -- that's been fixed now, thanks for reporting it and sorry for the inconvenience. Is there a way to get feedback or guidance on these items? Does Apple understand that some sites may depend on the posted code, and when it just haphazardly disappears or doesn't get posted, and there is no communication about it, that it can be worrying? This list is a good place to raise these issues, but I (and probably others at Apple) don't always have time to read the list everyday. For urgent items, sending an email to opensource@apple.com or filing a bug report via <http://bugreporter.apple.com/> might receive more immediate attention. We do what we can. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com