site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On 3 Mar 2006, at 16:57, André-John Mas wrote: Hi, leeg@blatand:~>file `which cp` /bin/cp: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures /bin/cp (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386 /bin/cp (for architecture ppc): Mach-O executable ppc Cheers, Graham. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
From what I have heard X11 fails miserably with Rosetta on the new Intel Macs.
Is this something to do with the way Rosetta handles things, or the way the libraries that X11 are implemented. It's something to do with the rumours sources you use; X11 and rosetta seems to function rather well for me (using an Intel iMac with a PPC windowmaker, rxvt, glxgears, idlde and gimp all appear to work). I'd recommend you just pick up an el cheapo Intel Mini, and test the apps you're expecting to use... Also, is it possible to implement unix tools as universal binaries? smime.p7s