site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) This could help me for turf related stuff :) -- Graham Lee UNIX Systems Manager, Oxford Physics Practical Course http://users.ox.ac.uk/~wadh1342 _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... On 17/2/06 19:44, Stéphane Sudre wrote: What would be interesting to see in the Intel source version is the explanation why one week before the announcement of Mac OS X for Intel at WWDC, the x86 version of Darwin was said to be a dying 3-leg horse from a performance point of view with no hope of recovery and now, since the release of the Intel iMac Core Duo, it is (or stated to be) a stalion. I think (or at least, it appears to be) because "Darwin/x86" and "Darwin on OS X for Intel" are probably different beasties. I'm surprised there's not been more activity over on darwin-x86@ actually... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com