Re: __builtin_frame_address()
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On May 25, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote: _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com Is __builtin_frame_address() broken? I have some backtracing code that walks the stack essentially using: By the lack of response here, I suspect that this might be the wrong list to ask. Can someone suggest a better one? On a slightly related note, the first few values that frame->lr holds are in unrelated functions that are not on the stack at the time. This is new in gcc 4. Prior versions seemed to provide sane addresses. After the first few functions, the stack seems correct. As a follow up to this, the addresses are correct, it was my address to symbol lookup that for some reason isn't working any more. - Steve smime.p7s
participants (1)
-
Steve Checkoway