site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=alastairs-place.net; h=cc: message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references; q= dns/txt; s=aug07; bh=7iqHjyXJRrBsEO79u1jOHF8ie1o=; b=WkhuDHavIf2 lkBisw04XTBqCdX7KYchxRIMgWAE151JY1RDScq7dofVp8aEWBVbA4veoT41OJEj 8Ju809UxfIE8YGso9MILyoopuIE6TdCFmWRzsnQlKM6a/Du+fn9qTGaX0BwuBKS8 GdHDvg9CAO15BqM1Oh5c+Kl7qroSmw40= On 29 Aug 2009, at 13:23, Tim Seufert wrote: Kind regards, Alastair. -- http://alastairs-place.net _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... I don't think you understood me. I'll restate it more clearly: there are some EFI64 Macs which will not load the 64-bit kernel even if you attempt to override the default choice by pressing "6" and "4" during boot. Thus, EFI bitness is clearly not the only criterion, if it is one at all (we outsiders have insufficient information to know whether it actually is, IMO). Indeed, my guess is that (on machines that are actually 64-bit capable) it has rather more to do with not having 64-bit versions of some of the required device drivers... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com