site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Le 10 janv. 09 à 12:12, Joel Reymont a écrit : Charles, On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Charles Bailey wrote: To be futur proof and not rely on Mach-O implementation details ? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This is a possibly dumb question, just for my own info: isn't the canonical way to do this (in the absence of a cross-compiler that cross-links) to cross-compile to Mach-O object files under Linux, then use ld on OS X to link them into an executable? It's a Forth environment that cross-compiles to a number targets, many of them embedded microcontrollers (no OS). Everything needed to build an executable image is available on the host and introducing an extra linking step is an inconvenience. In other words yes, I could use an extra linking step, but why should I bother? This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com