site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Shantonu On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Shawn Erickson wrote: Hi, From what I have heard X11 fails miserably with Rosetta on the new Intel Macs. Is this something to do with the way Rosetta handles things, or the way the libraries that X11 are implemented. No idea haven't tried. If it can be compiled Apple's GCC 4.0.1 it likely can be made universal rather easily. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This isn't really an appropriate place to talk about Rosetta compatibility, which is a feature of Mac OS X for Intel systems, not part of the Darwin layer. If you have specific applications (and not speculation) on applications that run on PPC systems but not under Rosetta, and they don't fall into one of the categories in <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/...

of things that specifically don't work under Rosetta, you should file a bug at <http://bugreporter.apple.com>, with information on the application and what class of users are affected. On 3/3/06, André-John Mas <ajmas@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Also, is it possible to implement unix tools as universal binaries? -Shawn _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/ssen% 40opendarwin.org This email sent to ssen@opendarwin.org This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com