Re: Universal binaries and X11
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kIsI516f2aa/o2VsGmdY7xs1PfQ/mJo/7pF1GJF5CnctOoRf/zHhMef8T7dPMZJqsOmdlPi7Ymr2KX4yonYVniABuQymqqfTwSlSAEHXp9WtxVZCh1ABbIvzZRw1MmitTKqs3KO1Iu0kSripAtnMcmEhgQCTdr4zH+iXnmB4A8M= On 3/5/06, Cyrus Harmon <ch-darwin@bobobeach.com> wrote:
It's also rumored that software that expects to handle Unix signals gets bogus signal contexts under Rosetta, so if your software expects to setup signal handlers and get access to registers and what not from a signal context this won't work.
I don't know about "rumored"; <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/index.html> says:
Rosetta does not support precise exceptions. Any application that relies on register states being accurate in exception handlers or signal handlers will not function properly running with Rosetta.
which sounds pretty definitive to me.
Not that this has anything to do with X11, of course.
Yes. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Brian Bechtel