site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Full is the operative word. davez On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Graham J Lee wrote: Hi, -Jason _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... On Sep 29, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Dave Zarzycki wrote: It'll work, but it won't be full. I doubt you'll notice the difference though. I've been playing with launchd and have compiled a new version (it can veto jobs if the system's running off a battery). Obviously I've had to build it from the Darwin source, so I've had to #ifdef out a chunk of code...see http://release.opendarwin.org/release/ 8.2.1/Sources/launchd-106-darwin.patch The question is, before I hose either of my machines, could a launchd with that patch above applied actually boot a full Tiger? Has anyone tried it? You may want to not apply the first part of that patch if you intend to browse /Network in the Finder at all. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com