Re: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com kqueue. Use EVFILT_PROC. davez On Feb 15, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: Hello, Thanks Jeffrey Johnson Macintosh Development Wavefunction, Inc. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/zarzycki%40apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... Now that the use of task_for_pid() on intel boxes has been tightened to use by root or processes belonging to procmod: <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/...
those of us relying on the helpful snippet in TN2050 have been chopped off at the knees. Does anyone have a workaround for getting notified when a process terminates without resorting to polling? (I only care about processes owned by my UID.) This email sent to zarzycki@apple.com This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Dave Zarzycki