site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On 26 Mar 2005, at 19:49, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Mar 26, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Marcel Weiher wrote: ( options: --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,objc ) - Is gcc-1765 really a good base? What would be a good/better base? - - Where could I get that? - Any other recommendations? Yes, I will do that. Thanks for the help! Cheers, Marcel _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... [trying to compile gcc from cvs] What is the error? There were initial errors trying to configure specific projects (getting the size of 'int' and such). Hardcoding those got me further, but there were further errors. Anyway: I just retried, but only enabling the C and Objective-C languages, and what do you know? It worked! :-) I disabled mudflap because I remembered that causing problems earlier, might not be absolutely necessary. Apple's gcc is not really a good place for working on a new front-end for GCC really. Also Apple's GCC depends on things being declared and really only supports the C family front-ends as you found out. Yep. Though apparently only doing C frontends also helps with the FSF GCC. I would use the mainline FSF gcc. There are only a few features which are in Apple's gcc which are not in the FSF's gcc. Most of them are C family based features which should not matter to a new front-end. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com