site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On Jan 20, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Pete Gontier wrote: circa 1/19/06 4:29 AM, "Stefan Haller" <haller@ableton.com> wrote: circa 1/19/06 9:38 PM, Quinn wrote: I've been working on this all week. It's much more challenging than I thought it would be. No ETA as of yet. -Eric _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... I'm wondering if or when we can expect the MoreBacktrace stuff from the MoreIsBetter sample code to be ported to i386? It might be better at this point to use dwarf2 eh tables to get a backtrace than it is from x86's stack frame because if you don't have a frame pointer, stack frames are "messed" up. Mac OS X doesn't support DWARF yet and the compiler doesn't omit frame pointers (though you can write asm functions which omit them), so for now regular backtracing code will work fine in nearly all cases. Unfortunately, MoreBacktrace should handle all cases, not nearly all, so it'll take a little bit longer before it's ready. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com