Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com [ ... could have been quoting me, too ... ] -- Terry _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote: On Sep 4, 2009, at 10:00 AM, William Siegrist wrote: The Darwin Team is aware of the request for libunwind. I'll put down another vote for it, so no need to file more radars or emails. Comments like this confuse me since other @apple.com people have said that radars are the only way Apple knows what people are wanting and duplicate radars show more interest. The radar in this case isn't an engineering radar, it's a legal one, and they d not like taking interrupts. A bunch of dups on a legal radar are not going to really bear on what is, in the end, a business rather than a technical decision. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Terry Lambert