site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com On Jun 4, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Markus Hitter wrote: Am 04.06.2006 um 18:03 schrieb Erik Paulson: ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ AgentM agentm@themactionfaction.com ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... We don't need to have a discussion here again about what Apple is doing, why they are doing whatever it is that they are doing, and why Apple should or shouldn't release the the latest xnu source and go back to the old way of doing things and all of the wonderful things that were happening because of the source availablity. Now can we go back to arguing about launchd? One might wonder what's the difference between these two discussions. Apple has proved more than once they sometimes simply "forget" their promises and sometimes simply don't care about satisfaction of their (non-paying?) developers. Same for xnu as for launchd. Maybe this is the price for working on/with the about most innovative OS currently available. The innovation will move where it has space to move. Personally, I don't like submarine features, surprises, and flighty/ambiguous "dedications" to the open-source movement. There is no coherent message on this from Apple because there are hundreds of dissenting opinions on how to handle the whole situation and no one wants to jump the gun. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com