Re: MoreBacktrace for i386?
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Hi, (Yes, I filed a radar feature request, oh, some years ago :-) Lassi -- When the situation is desperate, it is too late to be serious. Be playful. --Edward Abbey _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... It might be better at this point to use dwarf2 eh tables to get a backtrace than it is from x86's stack frame because if you don't have a frame pointer, stack frames are "messed" up. Ah but the interesting bit is getting through signal frames and other bits of code without supporting eh tables ;-) Otherwise the compiler-bundled _Unwind_* stuff would have been sufficient already on PPC. Real support in system library for backtrace() (like linux), or any similar call found on other operating systems would be very welcome. Doesn't have to be standard across platforms, as long as it understands and goes through signal frames and other odd bits of code. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Lassi A.Tuura