Re: Universal binaries and X11
site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-dev@lists.apple.com Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RprSELZoQ3ypSFfKHfosgBwt63/LfsQdLPRpXee+2dZ0vOs1cD3LvdKXaw+Ka35cfFnU4sex/rq3ipm2epsz4i4i1blocuvj5lj9GlZGXFj3fvoU2yIq0S56+RlHBvbbnBfk75Rkm2yToh/Kk2QbrjA4wC2+s9F5gIAFf8qLQx0= On 3/3/06, André-John Mas <ajmas@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Hi,
From what I have heard X11 fails miserably with Rosetta on the new Intel Macs. Is this something to do with the way Rosetta handles things, or the way the libraries that X11 are implemented.
No idea haven't tried.
Also, is it possible to implement unix tools as universal binaries?
If it can be compiled Apple's GCC 4.0.1 it likely can be made universal rather easily. -Shawn _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (Darwin-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/site_archiver%40lists.appl... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com
participants (1)
-
Shawn Erickson