site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com On Mar 15, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Bhavesh Davda wrote: Yeah, I was trying to avoid having 2 system calls for every read(2): a read(2) and an ioctl(2)/setsockopt(2), to get this functionality. What "functionality" are you actually trying to achieve? = Mike _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... There are control flow models available for most reasonable behaviours already; it feels like you have decided on one that history has so far rejected... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com