site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com -josh On Aug 15, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: Dear all, I have a simple question: But netstat -m gives for example: [PowerMac:/] tuexen% netstat -m 330 mbufs in use: 325 mbufs allocated to data 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers 3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 1 mbufs allocated to Appletalk data blocks 376/848 mbuf clusters in use 1778 Kbytes allocated to network (46% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines Thank you very much for your help. Best regards Michael This email sent to jgraessley@apple.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com If I remember correctly, mbufs themselves are stored in clusters. A cluster can be used as a cluster on it's own or it can be used to store mbufs. An mbuf is a fraction of a cluster. If the system runs out of mbufs, it may convert a cluster in to something like 8 mbufs. Normally a used cluster element is one where there exist an mbuf which has a pointer to the cluster element. This happens at least when you get it with m_mclget or the corresponding macro. This would than mean that the number of uses mbufs is not larger than the number of used mbuf clusters. Why can it happen that the number of mbuf clusters is larger than the number of mbufs? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/jgraessley% 40apple.com smime.p7s