On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 11:28 AM, Emiel Kollof wrote: Louis Gerbarg heeft op dinsdag 26 februari 2002 om 19:52 het volgende geschreven: [snip] Apple-222 is different than Apple-201-5. The deal is when new kernels are submitted internally they are generally given a new montonically increasing number. When the source for those is checked into Darwin with the tag they are checked in under being Apple-nnn where nnn is the version of the project. The notable difference between the kernels you listed is that Apple-201 was the kernel that shipped with Mac OS X 10.1 and Darwin 1.4.1. After that stuff for software updates was done on the Apple-201-xx branch, and more work not targetted at the software update kept having increasing numbers. There is no -STABLE or -CURRENT as in FreeBSD, Interesting... So if I want to track xnu (and other modules) I just have to follow the default branch (what you get if you don't supply a branch with -r). No.Top of tree is not something you want, it may not work, or it may have problems. You want to pull a tagged release. Also, newer kernels may have dependencies on other packages, like Libc, etc. Simply pulling hte newest kernel and trying to run it on a release of Darwin or OS X may have signficant issues. Louis _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.