site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) For x86 it is. If you take a look at http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.6.x86/ vs. http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.6.ppc/ Matt _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... you will see a big difference. Is there an official story behind this? I noticed when trying to use the xnu source to debug, say, some signal handling problems, that the i386 xnu code was demonstrably very different from what's actually in OS X 10.4.6 for x86. That MacWorld story is light on details, but seems to be mostly talking about pirates and "Don't Steal Mac OS X.kext". Has there been an official announcement that the Darwin and xnu source for x86 isn't intended to reflect OS X, or that it won't in the future? This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com