site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=7a62MCA8YPUoCH9l3kYCg1yE8AkCOP6Jz9+kUhzW0gA=; b=s3ZJmZy9qfeE1MB8ExTj0f9AMS4ArmPyPFiKIMFg/0SWLUfJ7uQtOKcS6+XA8cY4M5 AEDqtL3BsqgGMdjQ6Kjli7vRumF5ksUy1gVVSEO1e5DpV3A2dxQybXkywvYtUa9LqJLB h0abFrrdFMe9lRsVBLaQIZR/qsg045IA+3e5s= On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Amanda Walker wrote:
Why? Invoking the utilities is more robust in the presence of kernel and SPI changes.
I figure using the API will be faster and more robust in the presence of errors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - for hire: mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and usb drivers ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com