site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Folks, I’ve a question about the possibility of chaining socket filter. So assume I have two socket filters, and I want to register them ( let’s say globally ). Now I would assume they would be chained along with the existing ones ( if any ). Now what is the mechanism of hand-off ( For example, a shared ISR vector can have multiple interrupts registered thru a chain. Or like multiple exception handling registered in some stack fashion ). So there are two returns to indicate, if the kernel continue thru the chain or not. Is it possible ? If so, then what would be the return indicator/value so that the Network BF module can pass it along the chain. And what would be the value to cut short ( of course without error, something like EJUSTRETURN ??? ). Thanks, Prokash _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.... This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com