Re: UFS not 64-bit clean?

13 Dec 2001


      ...
...
Hmmm, also.... please don't ask me why I did this:
...
...
...
...
...
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
...
...
...
#endif /* REV_ENDIAN_FS */
...
...
...
...
...
...
brelse(bp);
...
...
...
-		return (EIO);		/* XXX needs translation */
...
...
...
+		/*return (EIO);		 XXX needs translation */
...
...
...
...
...

...
I wonder why it did not panic later when you brelse(bp) the same buffer
...
again....
...

...
386     brelse(bp);
Well, please note that, although I can't think of any reason

I would have commented out the return there (well, OK; the reason

had something to do with 2am, I guess), it has nothing to do with

the panic. Aside from the fact that the conditions at line 361

are not met, I don't see any reason ffs_reload() would be getting

called here...


----

Chris J. Bednar

Director, Distributed Computing Product Group

http://AdvancedDataSolutions.com/

    

Chris Bednar