site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com A clarification: On Jul 12, 2005, at 13:09 , Justin C. Walker wrote: Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for General Semantics -------- When LuteFisk is outlawed, Only outlaws will have LuteFisk -------- _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... On Jul 12, 2005, at 12:28 , Allan Hoeltje wrote: [snip] I mean: ENOBUFS usually means no space of some kind - either no buffers or no space to put buffers in, depending. Since this is not a common problem for existing code, it seems likely that it is due to something you are doing, presumably incorrectly. To what existing code do you refer? Here, I meant all of the code in Mac OS X; it runs without a lot (in general, that's "no") of ENOBUFS problems as it comes from the factory, so most of the code that is running on a Mac OS X system does not see this problem. Again, that doesn't mean there are no bugs, but the wise programmer checks his own code first :-} This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com