site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:45 AM, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: That is very true indeed! (-: Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... On 7 Mar 2007, at 12:25, Michael Smith wrote: If you are not working with a file system then I would suggest checking out what ubc_upl_map() does and following it up that way to figure out what to do analogously. That's probably not a good suggestion; the UBC implementation does not use KPI. If the page is sourced from an address space (as I inferred from the Bhavesh's original request) then there's no need to construct the UPL (it will happen automagically if the page has to be faulted in). What this boils down to, again, is that without more information on what Bhavesh actually wants to do (i.e. not "there is this call in Linux"), we're not really able to help him very much. 8) This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com