Louis Gerbarg heeft op dinsdag 26 februari 2002 om 19:52 het volgende geschreven: [snip] Apple-222 is different than Apple-201-5. The deal is when new kernels are submitted internally they are generally given a new montonically increasing number. When the source for those is checked into Darwin with the tag they are checked in under being Apple-nnn where nnn is the version of the project. The notable difference between the kernels you listed is that Apple-201 was the kernel that shipped with Mac OS X 10.1 and Darwin 1.4.1. After that stuff for software updates was done on the Apple-201-xx branch, and more work not targetted at the software update kept having increasing numbers. There is no -STABLE or -CURRENT as in FreeBSD, Interesting... So if I want to track xnu (and other modules) I just have to follow the default branch (what you get if you don't supply a branch with -r). 3. Am I on the right mailing list for questions like these? Or should I move this to darwin-development? This kind of questions is probably appropriate for either list, not sure which one it is more appropriate on. Oh well, at least I got some answers :) Thanks for your time. I will not return to my regular programming and submit build errors, bugs or other stuff that ticks me :) Cheers, Emiel _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
participants (1)
-
Emiel Kollof