site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Ok, thanks. I just had never heard this before. Do you know, offhand, what is different? Is there a list somewhere? Thanx, JP On 2 Jun 2005, at 23:29, Kevin Van Vechten wrote: - Kevin On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:45 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: JP On 2 Jun 2005, at 12:52, Kevin Van Vechten wrote: This email sent to jpell.lists@mac.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... Obviously there's a difference that prompted you to ask if you could build the "full" version in the first place. My response is true, and I know because I post the source code archives. Is this true? I never knew that XNU was different between the editions. I do know that many kexts are binary only. Is this speculation or knowledge? Do you have references... No, it is not possible. Apple does not release the entire source code of the mach_kernel. However, there is rarely any practical difference, and I haven't personally encountered any problems using a Darwin kernel on Mac OS X. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/jpell.lists% 40mac.com This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com