6 Mar
2003
6 Mar
'03
3:06 a.m.
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 09:24 PM, Vivek Balasubramanyam wrote: This makes sense, but I just have one more question. If I'm not allocating a wait_queue, then I suppose I need an event_t to wait on and signal. But, event_t is just a void*, so I'm not sure what it actually should be. How about "(void *)&device->readQueue"? As long as that is what gets passed to the thread_wakeup() call, you will be fine. --Jim _______________________________________________ darwin-kernel mailing list | darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-kernel Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
8281
Age (days ago)
8281
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jim Magee