site_archiver@lists.apple.com Delivered-To: darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com I can also wait a while for it. (For me, not having any access to Leopard kernel sources after Leopard is released, would be disappointing.) Thanks go to Kevin (or whoever else gets the sources "opened"). rick _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (Darwin-kernel@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/site_archiver%40lists.a... At 3:50 PM +0100 3/23/07, Andreas Fink wrote: That's what someone would expect if its OPEN source. Otherwise the kernel should be declared CLOSED source as its source is not revealed (or at least the difference between the released binary and the released source). Although I can understand the argument, I will simply note that I greatly appreciate being able to build a kernel from Open Sources that replaces the shipped binary. It doesn't bother me that it isn't identical to the shipped binary. This email sent to site_archiver@lists.apple.com